The Transcendental Fibonacci is much better in transcendental calculations.
They correspond to the Trinity – π as the beginning of all, e as the second, and their ratio – the third.
Now, we need to perform even more exact calculations. It will be a ‘derivate’ of all these three fundamental numbers. The derivatives are necessary to do things.
So, I named the derivates of Fundamental Numbers with the names of the Holy Trinity:
Pater (Father), P = π x e x f = π x e x (7/5) x (π/e) = (7/5) x π2 = 13.81744661615…
Next is Filius (Son),
Filius, F = (π/e) / f = (π x e) / [(7/5) x (π/e) = (π x e) x ( (5/7) x (e/π) = (5/7) x e2= 5.27789721352…
The Third Personification is Spiritus Sanctus,
Spiritus, S = P / F = [(7/5) x π2] / [(5/7) x e2] = [(7/5) x (π/e)]2 = f2 = 2061798318583…
As you can see, Spiritus, S = Fibonacci squared, f2
Combinations of all these three numbers, P, F and S, plus their 'parents', will give an amazing result by changing some traditional math.
However, there is one more number to introduce; this is ‘100’, and powers of ‘10’ in general.
Here are the quotes:
Mary about the number one hundred, taken from ‘The Revelations of St. Birgitta of Sweden’, Volume 1,
Liber Caelestis, Chapter 50, p. 140. Translated by Denis Searby.
The Mother answered to the Son: 'All virtues and glory are yours, my Son! You are my God and my mercy; all good that I have comes from you. You are like the seed that was never sown but still grew and gave fruit a hundredfold and a thousandfold. For all mercy comes from you and since it is innumerable and ineffable, it can indeed be signified by the number one hundred, which signifies perfection.’
And
God the Eternal Father, the Creator about the Number One Hundred, taken from ‘The Dialogue of the Seraphic Virgin Catherine of Siena’ translated by Algar Thorold, ‘A Treatise of Obedience’, Chapter CXLI, page 337.
‘Do I not, however often cause one who gives alms to multiply in temporal goods? In return for what do I this? In return for the gift of his own will. This is the one for which I repay him a hundredfold. What is the meaning of the number a hundred? A hundred is a perfect number, and cannot be added to except by recommencing from the first. So charity is the most perfect of all the virtues, so perfect that no higher virtue can be attained, except by recommencing at the beginning of self-knowledge, and thus increasing many hundredfold in merit; but you always necessarily arrive at the number one hundred.’
The number 100, and powers of 10 will show up in many equations.
Now, my intention was to find masses of the neutrinos following the general narrative. However, once I have arrived at general formulas, it was obvious that it is not mass, but probably the g factor (magnetic moment) of neutrinos, similar to electron, muon, proton, and neutron. Why?
As you will see in the equations, the g factor of the electron (i.e., magnetic moment of the electron) appears in three formulas. Meaning, that the three neutrino formulas actually give the magnetic moments /or something else? /
I will go into the details later on. Currently, the oscillation angles of the neutrinos are perfectly calculated (according to the most up to date results) and the value of each neutrino to the power (2/3) has a different formula, involving the g factor of the electron, Fibonacci, f, Filius, F, π, and integers 10, 100, 2 and 2 to the second power (=4).
values of the magnetic moment of the neutrinos and formulas derived;
electron g-factor = 2.00231930436256
(Nθ13)2/3 = (π3/100) x (f) x (22/2+g) = 0.709350404026… this is the magnetic moment of the neutrino N13,
(Nθ12)2/3 = (1/4-g) x (g1/4-g) x (f1/3) = 0.831910826725… this is magnetic moment of neutrino N12,
(Nθ23)2/3 = (π3/10) x (g3/4) x (F) = 27.5461270999… this is the magnetic moment of neutrino N23
The moment of the neutrino N23 is huge, but the calculations do not contain an error.
So, as you can see in the above examples, the Transcendental Fibonacci, f, the Filius, F and g-factor of an electron, as well as π, 10, 100 and 2 show up in the formulas. Meaning, that the three neutrino formulas actually give the magnetic moments /or something else? / The results are nice, elegant, however, a bit difficult, but hey, this is not easy stuff.
In the next articles I will show you, dear reader, step by step how the formulas were obtained.
I have been looking for neutrino masses, but it seems that in the real world they are of secondary value, or maybe that’s what is difficult to find, but it generates a lot of attention and money.
It is possible that the results also show the energy of neutrinos, and maybe the mass may be calculated from this (?), not the other way (if we had speed of light in dimensionless units). Taking into account that the differences between the squared masses of three neutrinos are 1/10000 for Nθ13 and Nθ12 and 1/400 for Nθ23 and Nθ12 (or Nθ13 – since the latter two are almost identical), it is obvious that the above results cannot be energy (we could use E = mc2 to prove it.)
God the Eternal Father - Sint-Salvatorskathedraal_beeld_Artus_Quellinus_R01_(cropped):
Comments powered by CComment